11 AFAM Toolkit Worksheet
The AFAM Toolkit dashboard will keep track of all of your steps and automatically generate a report once you’ve complete all steps. However, you may also wish to keep track of the outputs from each step on a hard copy piece of paper, especially since the dashboard does not currently allow you to save your work.
As your work through each step, fill out the following tables.
Step 1 – Determine assessment and management tiertermine assessment and management tier
Step 1 outputs – Data Inventory
Minimum Required Data | Needed? | Available? | Years of data |
---|---|---|---|
Qualitative characterization of the fishery | Required | ||
List of prioritized species for management | Required | ||
List of prioritized goals for management | Required | ||
Landings, effort, and CPUE of key target species | Optional | ||
Length composition data of key target species | Optional | ||
Density ratio from UVC (key target species) | Optional | ||
Biomass ratio from UVC (aggregated across species) | Optional |
Step 1 outputs – Assessment and Management Tier
Response | |
---|---|
What is your assessment and management tier? | |
Notes |
Step 2 – Determine appropriate Fisheries Management Controls
Step 2 outputs – Existing fisheries management controls (FMCs)
Existing FMC 1 | Existing FMC 2 | Existing FMC 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
Name of Existing FMC | |||
Who introduced this FMC? Who implements this FMC? | |||
Resources required for implementation | |||
Level of compliance | |||
Community Attitude towards FMC | |||
Is the FMC effective in meeting management objectives? | |||
Other implementation pro/cons | |||
Notes |
Step 2 outputs – Potential new fisheries management controls (FMCs)
Question | New FMC 1 | New FMC 2 | New FMC 3 |
---|---|---|---|
Name of potential new FMC | |||
Possible Implications (positive or negative) |
Step 3 – Select performance indicators, reference points, and assessment methods
Step 3 outputs Note: We generally recommend using 3 performance indicators, from 3 independent data sources if possible.
PI 1 | PI 2 | PI 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
Performance Indicator Name | |||
Data source | |||
Target Reference Point (TRP) | |||
Limit Reference Point (LRP) | |||
Notes |
Step 4 – Define Harvest Control Rules Step 4 outputs
Scenario | PI 1 Stoplight | PI 2 Stoplight | PI 3 Stoplight | Interpretation | Management Response |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | |||||
2 | |||||
3 | |||||
4 | |||||
5 | |||||
6 | |||||
7 | |||||
8 |
Step 5 - Perform assessment methods Step 5 outputs
PI 1 | PI 2 | PI 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
PI Name | |||
PI Value | |||
Notes |
Step 6 – Interpret assessment results Step 6 outputs
PI 1 | PI 2 | PI 3 | |
---|---|---|---|
PI Name | |||
PI Value | |||
TRP Value | |||
LRP Value | |||
Stoplight Result |
Step 7 - Adjust fisheries management controls using defined harvest control rules Step 7 outputs
Response | |
---|---|
Selected management response | |
Notes |